<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Grayger &#187; Douglas Crockford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.grayger.com/tag/douglas-crockford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.grayger.com</link>
	<description>In the pursuit of effectiveness</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>JavaScript The Good Parts</title>
		<link>http://www.grayger.com/javascript/javascript-the-good-parts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grayger.com/javascript/javascript-the-good-parts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grayger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Crockford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grayger.com/wp/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;JavaScript The Good Parts&#8221; by Douglas Crockford is one of the most subjective books on JavaScript because it dares to divide JavaScript language specifications into good parts and bad parts.
Most of good parts are well-known, but not widely used. I can see they are fully and correctly used in JavaScript frameworks or toolkits but they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;JavaScript The Good Parts&#8221; by Douglas Crockford is one of the most subjective books on JavaScript because it dares to divide JavaScript language specifications into good parts and bad parts.</p>
<p>Most of good parts are well-known, but not widely used. I can see they are fully and correctly used in JavaScript frameworks or toolkits but they are rarely or inappropriately used by page designers.</p>
<p>For me, sections on bad parts are much useful. I tell &#8220;===&#8221; from &#8220;==&#8221; but I have never used &#8220;===&#8221; just because I, as a Java programmer, am not familiar to it. The book helps use bad parts less rather than use good parts more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grayger.com/javascript/javascript-the-good-parts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Douglas Crockford&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://www.grayger.com/javascript/douglas-crockfords-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.grayger.com/javascript/douglas-crockfords-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 12:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grayger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JavaScript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adsafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Douglas Crockford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JSON]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.grayger.com/wp/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I found Douglas Crockford&#8217;s blog. Although I am very interested in his articles, finding his blog took a long time since http://www.crockford.com/ doesn&#8217;t provide any link to it. Reading posts was enjoyable. I note down some impressive posts.
Introducing other&#8217;s work

 A paper, Using JavaScript as a Real Programming Language
 The Non-Designer&#8217;s Design Book

Introducing his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I found <a href="http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-TBPekxc1dLNy5DOloPfzVvFIVOWMB0li">Douglas Crockford&#8217;s blog</a>. Although I am very interested in his articles, finding his blog took a long time since <a href="http://www.crockford.com/">http://www.crockford.com/</a> doesn&#8217;t provide any link to it. Reading posts was enjoyable. I note down some impressive posts.</p>
<p><strong>Introducing other&#8217;s work</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> A paper, Using JavaScript as a Real Programming Language</li>
<li> The Non-Designer&#8217;s Design Book</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Introducing his work</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Adsafe</li>
<li> Contributions to JSON</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Informative but arguable (in my view)</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> XML&#8217;s future in WEB : XML is on web trending down. XHTML failed to displace HTML because
<ul>
<li>Its client-side validation is not so beneficial.</li>
<li>It lacks security model</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Thread is evil.</li>
<li> Scribe, the first trial of data-document translation, is similar to JSON. Adopting SGML and XML instead of it was a bad choice.</li>
</ul>
<p>Security of JavaScript seems to be one of his current concerns. <a href="http://yuiblog.com/blog/2008/03/24/crockford-ajaxworld-ch9/">His recent talk</a> shows his approaches toward the security problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.grayger.com/javascript/douglas-crockfords-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

